5 practical ways to prove internal comms ROI (and finally unlock budget)
If you work in internal communications, you’ve probably been asked some version of:
“But what’s the actual impact?”
Whoever’s asking the question — an executive, a stakeholder, a budget approver — isn’t looking for engagement. Or reach. Or clicks.
They want to see tangible impact of internal comms on the business. And that question exposes a gap. Because, as digital communication and collaboration expert Sharon O’Dea put it in our recent webinar:
“It’s not that leaders don’t care about communication. It’s that the value isn’t always framed in terms they prioritize.”
That’s the real problem.
Of course internal communications drive impact across the business — but too often, the function is positioned in a way that feels disconnected from the outcomes leaders actually care about.
In the session, Sharon unpacked how to close that gap, with a practical framework for connecting comms to real business problems, measurable outcomes, and ultimately, investment.
Here are five takeaways you can apply immediately.
{{the-comms-roi-playbook="/callouts"}}
1. Start with the business problem, not the comms ask
What’s leadership actually worried about?
Hint: It likely isn’t comms metrics, channels, or formats.
What keeps leaders up at night are the things that can make or break the success of the business over the long term.
Attrition. Productivity. Compliance. Change adoption.
That’s where your case needs to start. If you lead with a solution, you’re asking for budget. But if you lead with a business problem, you’re positioning comms to solve something that already has a cost attached to it.
This is where many business cases fall down early. They jump straight to the tactic — a new platform, a new channel, a new campaign — without anchoring it in a clear, existing problem.
Sharon’s advice was to slow down and do some light-touch discovery first. What’s actually getting in the way today? Where are people struggling to access information, complete tasks, or understand what’s expected of them?
Sometimes the issue isn’t a lack of tools — it’s a mismatch between what exists and how people actually work.
When you start there, your business case becomes much easier to land.
2. Find the friction — that’s where your ROI is hiding
One of the most practical prompts from Sharon points to one of the biggest unlocks:
“Where are poor comms creating measurable drag?”
Because comms teams know that ROI doesn’t live in dashboards. It lives in the day-to-day friction employees deal with.
You see it in:
- Managers repeating or clarifying missed updates
- Onboarding that takes longer than it should
- Change initiatives that stall or never fully land
- Safety issues linked to missed or inaccessible information
This is what good communication actually impacts. And more importantly, this is what the business is already paying for. They’re just not calling it “comms.”
One example Sharon shared brought this to life: An employee who said the only time they read company emails was when they were in the bathroom — because that was the only uninterrupted moment in their day.
That’s not an engagement problem. That’s an access problem.
And when you frame it like that, it becomes much easier to connect communication to productivity, efficiency, and performance.
3. Stop reporting activity, start proving impact
“We improved reach by 20%” isn’t a business case.
It’s a metric. It’s useful. But on its own, it doesn’t mean much.
Instead, Sharon encourages internal comms teams to reframe comms metrics in terms of operational outcomes:
- We reduced onboarding time by three days
- We cut policy clarification tickets by 18%
- We improved shift-fill speed
Now you’re speaking the language of the business — and building credibility for the internal comms function along the way.
This doesn’t mean you need perfect, direct ROI for everything. But it does mean connecting your metrics to something tangible.
- If reach improves: What did that enable?
- If engagement increases: What changed as a result?
- If access gets easier: What friction disappears?
The strongest cases don’t just show what happened. They show why it mattered.
4. Build a case that reflects reality, not assumptions
Comms teams are often more plugged into the business than they realize. Or as Sharon puts it, “You probably know where the bodies are buried.”
You know:
- Where people are blocked
- What leaders actually care about (even if they don’t say it directly)
- Where things break down between HQ and the frontline
But that insight, typically gathered through informal or educational conversations across the business, often remains as a qualitative input.
Building a business case is the perfect opportunity to put this invaluable knowledge to work. Use what you already know, and back it up with real examples. Pair data with lived experience. Combine survey results with actual employee stories.
This is what makes a case land. Not a 40-slide deck, not a long list of features, but a clear picture of what’s happening today — and what it’s costing.
And importantly, this is also how you build alignment across stakeholders.
Internal comms initiatives rarely get approved in isolation. Your case needs to resonate with finance, HR, IT, operations — each with their own priorities. The more grounded your case is in real business challenges, the easier it is to bring those groups with you.
5. Treat comms like infrastructure
“These things are treated as one-off programmes… and then you have to fight for them every time.”
Sound familiar?
A new tool gets funded. A project gets approved. And then two years later, you’re back at square one — rebuilding the case from scratch.
Sharon’s reframe: Good comms should be a staple of business hygiene.
When comms is positioned as a project, it’s easy to cut — but when it’s invested in as infrastructure, it becomes essential.
That shift doesn’t just change how you get budget. It changes how the business sees your role. Internal comms is no longer just a support function, but a part of how work actually gets done.
How to make the move from comms team to business translator
This is the shift.
As Sharon put it, we need to connect what we do to “specific and measurable” impact.
That means:
- Translating engagement into performance
- Translating comms into operational outcomes
- Translating investment into dollars saved
Because the value is already there.
And if you don’t make that shift, the business still pays, just quietly — in lost time, slower onboarding, missed information, and duplicated effort.
That’s the cost of doing nothing.
So the goal isn’t to make comms sound more impressive. It’s to make it visible, measurable, and undeniably fundable.
When you do that, you’re not asking for budget. You’re making a case the business can’t ignore.
